In the realm of royal nicknames, one stands out for its unique and unexpected nature: “Tungsten.”
This odd moniker, bestowed by King Charles, has now sparked considerable conversation among fans and critics alike.
While Meghan Markle has faced a myriad of less-than-flattering names online, ranging from “Duchess Difficult” to “Me-gain,” this one seems to have a deeper and perhaps unintended significance.
Charles reportedly dubbed Markle “Tungsten” during the early days of Harry and Meghan’s tenure as working royals, a name he chose in reference to her strong spirit and unyielding nature.
While being compared to a resilient metal might not seem like the greatest compliment at first glance, it appears Charles had sincere admiration behind his choice.
It was his way of warmly welcoming her into the royal fold.
The royals have a long-standing tradition of using nicknames within their inner circle, and this endearing terminology appears to reflect Charles’ recognition of Meghan’s capabilities.
Even before her royal ascension, Meghan was accustomed to affectionate naming, as her real first name is actually Rachel, yet she has always preferred to be called Meg.
Sources close to the royal family revealed to journalist Charlotte Griffiths that Charles saw in Meghan a “tungsten-type figure” who provided essential strength to Harry, who may sometimes require a more resilient presence in his life.
He viewed her as someone who could stand firm, akin to the element itself, known for its enduring strength and high melting point.
In fact, this nickname seems to echo Meghan’s early performances in royal events.
Her first major appearance with Prince Harry, alongside William and Kate during a joint Royal Foundation event in early 2018, marked a turning point.
Griffiths noted that Meghan shone during that occasion, showcasing intelligence, wit, and confidence—attributes that undoubtedly reinforced Charles’ favorable view.
Not long after, Charles’ bond with Meghan strengthened significantly.
He even walked her down the aisle during her wedding to Harry after her father could not attend.
This gesture spoke volumes about the regard he held for her, suggesting that he felt honored to step in as a paternal figure.
However, the question arises: Does Charles still perceive Meghan through this positive lens today?
Since stepping back from royal duties, she has voiced her criticisms regarding her time within the monarchy.
This shift might have altered the foundational views Charles had of her tough persona.
Meghan’s struggles with royal life became glaring during a candid 2019 interview where she articulated the pressures of her situation.
Tellingly, she expressed how few had checked on her well-being, indicating that behind the façade of strength lay a more vulnerable reality.
Her emotional revelations, while powerful, were perceived by some as out of touch given the context of her position.
Despite her resilience—as characterized by the term Tungsten—Meghan faced challenges that have led many to question whether that nickname still holds the same affection.
While Meghan remains a powerful figure, the past few years have seen a significant escalation in her critique of the royal family and the media’s treatment of her.
It’s interesting to note that while tungsten is one of the strongest metals on earth, it can also be toxic to living organisms.
This duality begs the question: Is the nickname really a badge of honor, or does it carry hidden drawbacks?
After all, an inexperienced admirer may not realize the complexity of associating with a substance that has both beneficial and detrimental properties.
Furthermore, Charles isn’t the only royal with a nickname for Meghan.
Prince Philip, for his part, allegedly referred to her as “DOW,” a nod to Wallis Simpson, who famously caused a stir in royal circles in the past.
This parallel might not reflect kindly on Meghan, as it highlights a more critical view aligned with historical tensions within the monarchy.
At the end of the day, the royal family appears to have transitioned towards a more reserved sentiment regarding Harry and Meghan.
According to reports, their names rarely come up in court circles anymore, with members opting for more evasive phrases like “persons who live overseas.”
Perhaps being called “Tungsten” is simply better than the silence that now often surrounds their names.
As the royal narrative continues to evolve, so too does the language they use to describe their once-beloved family members.
This ever-changing dynamic suggests a complex relationship, filled with strength, resilience, and the inevitable shadows cast by past and present grievances.
