Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

How American media turned its back on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

After once adoring and , America’s media landscape now seems to be singing a different tune.

A recent tell-all feature in Vanity Fair exposes the undeniable transformation in sentiment toward the royal couple, who had initially enjoyed warm support across the Atlantic.

The Sussexes’ decision to relocate to the was heavily influenced by their deep-seated resentment towards the British press.

This disdain unfolded dramatically in their impactful Netflix docuseries, where Harry shockingly linked the stress caused by media scrutiny to his wife’s loneliness and subsequent miscarriage.

His memoir, *Spare*, further detailed the emotional toll that incessant and intrusive media coverage took on him.

Despite their tumultuous relationship with the press back home, Harry and Meghan found themselves in a seemingly supportive environment in the U.S.

Initially, American media outlets were all too eager to give credence to the couple’s serious allegations aired during their explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey.

Accusations of racism and conspiracy within the royal family resonated widely, leading to a wave of public outrage that depicted the monarchy as out of touch and steeped in bias.

The uproar was so intense that many Americans took to social platforms with revolutionary fervor, calling for the dismantling of Buckingham Palace and the institution of the monarchy itself.

See also  Why Prince William is angry with 'dying' dad King Charles over Prince Harry

However, what began as applause and solidarity for the Sussexes has flipped dramatically, with former allies now expressing sharp criticism.

The turning point seemed to come in Vanity Fair’s recent cover story, which portrayed the couple under much less flattering light.

This 8,000-word deep dive starkly contrasts with the magazine’s earlier, affection-filled articles, marking a significant shift in tone.

The headline “American Hustle” set the stage for a list of allegations that ranged from annoying their upscale Montecito neighbors to suggestions that Meghan considered a potential ‘post-divorce’ book deal.

In its exploration, the article, penned by Anna Peele, drew from extensive research, revealing that various insiders painted Meghan as difficult to work with, with some staff members requiring therapy after their interactions with her.

Interestingly, Harry and Meghan opted to remain silent, choosing not to comment on the revelations.

Prior to Vanity Fair’s pivot, The Cut, a publication close to Meghan, also betrayed the couple, transforming from a realm of support to skepticism.

Originally, they showcased Meghan in an in-depth 2022 cover story, allowing her to voice her dissatisfaction with royal life.

Comments from the duchess suggested that her departure was not just a personal choice but a challenge to royal hierarchy itself.

See also  Queen Camilla was always ‘suspicious’ of Meghan Markle

However, by late December 2024, The Cut had radically altered its approach, implying that the Sussexes’ ventures were faltering.

The piece titled “Harry and Meghan’s Projects Can’t Stop Flopping” succinctly captured a new sentiment, critiquing their latest undertaking, a Netflix series called *Polo*, which failed to engage viewers, with minimal appearances from either Harry or Meghan.

Meanwhile, the Spotify saga has been another point of contention.

When the couple transitioned from royal life to carving out their own paths, they signed a substantial deal with the streaming giant, valued at around £15 million.

Meghan was pivotal in these negotiations, with her vision deemed essential for their audio projects.

Yet after only one season of Meghan’s podcast *Archetypes*, Spotify cut ties, citing a lack of productivity as a major reason.

Reports suggest the couple struggled to produce compelling content and didn’t captivate listeners as expected, undershooting the ambitious goals they had set for themselves.

The fallout from their Spotify experience was telling, with former insiders describing Meghan as disorganized, frequently changing ideas and delaying content development.

Bill Simmons, a podcaster who once collaborated with the couple, even labeled them as “grifters,” underscoring the growing critique of their brand.

See also  Meghan Markle didn't want to be in “second place” after Kate Middleton & Prince William

The evolving narrative underscores a startling decline in public sentiment; what was once a fairy tale, with Harry and Meghan at its heart, has morphed into a cautionary tale.

With support dwindling, the question remains: can the Sussexes rebuild their image in a landscape that seems increasingly filled with doubt?

' Scroll to continue reading '

New stories