Prince Philip, the late husband of Queen Elizabeth II, harbored concerns about Meghan Markle from the very start of her relationship with Prince Harry, according to insights from experts.
These worries apparently prompted him to alert the Queen about his reservations regarding the former actress.
Despite the broader royal family embracing Meghan, Philip remained notably skeptical of her apparent charm.
Royal biographer Ingrid Seward shared her perspective in her publication “My Mother and I,” shedding light on Philip’s feelings.
Following Meghan’s arrival into the royal fold, it seemed that much of the country adored her.
Nevertheless, Prince Philip was among the few individuals who remained hesitant about being charmed by her.
While the Queen openly supported Harry’s romance, Philip advised her to proceed with caution.
Seward remarked that the late monarch recognized the implications of Philip’s comparisons between Meghan and Wallis Simpson, an American who caused a royal crisis back in the 1930s.
It’s said that eventually, Queen Elizabeth herself noted, in her trademark succinct manner, that perhaps Harry was “too in love” with Meghan.
Interestingly, Seward elaborated on a private nickname that Philip had for Meghan, a label he was careful to refrain from voicing in public.
She characterized him as being quite astute about people, often striving to perceive the positives.
However, it seems that the parallels he drew between Meghan and the Duchess of Windsor—Wallis Simpson—were too striking to ignore.
The late Prince viewed Meghan through a critical lens, even going so far as to dub her “DoW,” which stood for “Duchess of Windsor.”
This nickname appears to have been a nod to his wariness and perhaps served as a reminder of the turbulent history that comes with marrying into the royal family.
Wallis Simpson was famously a twice-divorced American who created a scandal by leading King Edward VIII to abdicate the throne for her love in the early 20th century.
After his abdication, Edward took the title Duke of Windsor and spent much of his life away from Britain alongside Wallis, navigating the fallout from their unprecedented relationship.
Harry and Meghan tied the knot in 2018, but their fairy tale took a turn when they stepped back from royal duties, moving to California in what many have termed “Megxit” in early 2020.
These events have added layers of intrigue to the royal narrative and illuminate the complexities of marrying into such a storied lineage.
Seward’s insights reveal that Philip’s unease wasn’t merely about surface-level similarities—such as looks or backgrounds—but rather deeper implications of their respective roles within the royal family.
His comparisons hinted at the potential for a similar disruption that could echo the past.
As the British public warmed to Meghan, Philip stood out as an anomaly among the supportive royals.
His insightful observations of people extended to Meghan, suggesting that he was keenly aware of the potential ramifications of her presence.
Ultimately, the dynamics of Prince Harry and Meghan’s relationship unfold against a backdrop of historical parallels, where bygone royals continue to resonate through modern tales.
Philip’s cautionary stance serves as a reminder of the challenges that accompany royal relationships and the legacy of decisions made in the name of love.
